tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1344451816507800267.post875050430660093056..comments2023-09-28T00:47:38.175-07:00Comments on ISLAND COURT: CANTERBURY V. SPENCE - REVISITEDIsland Courthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11694418704626626545noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1344451816507800267.post-80062475293114111582013-10-18T07:10:21.312-07:002013-10-18T07:10:21.312-07:00Thanks for a very clear and well-explained analysi...Thanks for a very clear and well-explained analysis. Of course the 1% risk must never be viewed in isolation but in conjunction with the enormity or seriouslness of the risk that the percentile refers to. If one was not told that there was a 20% chance of a severe headache after the procedure, the surgeon will probably get away with it, but that changes dramaically when one is talking about paralysis - 1% assumes a very different significance.Neilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01128536573013458200noreply@blogger.com